Previously, APA viewed quotes from a ChatGPT chat session as akin to a personal communication. This approach was updated in 2025 due to the evolution of generative AI and increased retrievability of chats.
In-text citation example: When prompted with “What are some reasons to avoid generative ai for academic research?” Claude Sonnet 4.5 listed several points, including the tendency for generative AI models to create false citations (Anthropic, 2025).
AI Company Name. (year, month day). Title of chat in italics [Description, such as Generative AI chat]. Tool Name/Model. URL of the chat
Example:
Anthropic. (2025, December 11). Generative AI limitations in academic research [Generative AI chat]. Claude Sonnet 4.5. https://claude.ai/share/0c6f2224-8839-4150-80d3-c02194358cc0
If it isn't appropriate to cite a specific chat, an AI tool may need to be cited (see the APA Style Blog for more details).
AI Company Name. (year). Tool Name/Model in Italics and Title Case [Description; e.g., Large language model]. URL of the tool
Example:
Anthropic. (2025). Claude 4.5 Sonnet [Large language model]. https://claude.ai/new
The Modern Language Association provides detailed guidance on citing generative AI according to their template.
The following two articles from the Chicago Style Q&A may be helpful to review:
University of Chicago Press generally recommends acknowledging the use of an AI tool in your text, but gives the following examples as format citations (examples drawn from "Citation, Documentation of Sources" on Chicago Style Q&A blog) :
1 Text generated by ChatGPT, OpenAI, March 7, 2023, https://chat.openai.com/
If the prompt hasn't been included in the text, it can be included in the note:
1 ChatGPT, response to "Explain how to make pizza dough from common household ingredients," OpenAI, March 7, 2023, https://chat.openai.com/
Any information not included in the text is placed in the parenthetical reference. Example:
In the absence of formal recommendations from the NLM Style Guide, students and researchers can cite as personal communication. The NLM Style Guide recommends that personal communications are only cited in the text, and are not included in the reference list. Generally, the Vancouver referencing style uses numbered in-text citations, but for personal communications the advice is as follows:
Example: In response to the question ..., OpenAI's ChatGPT gave the following response ... (2023 Feb 22, unreferenced).
The Council of Science Editors recommends treating AI-generated content as personal communication. Personal communication advice is as follows:
Example: I wanted to see how it would respond to a prompt to "create a nonexistent dinosaur" (ChatGPT [OpenAI], response to question from author, 6 April 2023).
In addition to the MLA guidance on citing generative AI, the following guides and individuals were consulted when creating this guide: